” ““This may be the biggest lie ever told to the American public and the world at large,” said Mrs. Vinnedge. “Not only have there been hundreds of abortions directly involved with vaccine research – specifically for that purpose where they altered abortion methods to obtain intact fetal organs , but we are now seeing more and more abortions for fetal research and new cell lines emerging for viral vaccine cultivation.” While Children of God for Life has been trying to expose these truths for the past 15 years , those warnings are now ringing startling accurate as evidenced with the recent Planned Parenthood videos that have emerged through the Center for Medical Progress, (CMP) showing how live, fully intact fetuses have been harvested for aborted fetal research. And while Planned Parenthood has tried to claim the videos are doctored and they have done nothing wrong, in reality the facts supporting the CMP evidence is not only damning it has been fully documented in numerous science publications on vaccine research for the past 85 years.” “
Some religions it appears do not oppose vaccines made with aborted fetus cells because they were aborted in the 60’s and the cells are being replicated. However, most don’t realize that a three month old fetus was used in 2015 to make the latest line of vaccines. She gave her life unwillingly because as they put it, ” met all of these criteria and proved to be the best cell line”. How saw that the perfect specimen of human life was ripped from the womb and then taken to create a product that is injected into our babies.
” We obtained 9 fetuses through rigorous screening based on carefully specified inclusion criteria (see Methods section). TheWalvax-2 strain of cells met all of these criteria and proved to be the best cell line following careful evaluation. Therefore it was used for establishing a human diploid cell strain. “
So we all know that vaccines injure and kill children and adults on a daily basis around the world. We also know that the pharmaceutical company has no LIABILITY for when this happens and we, as consumers, are expected to just let it go. Even the Supreme Court has said that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe”. But here are some things you didn’t know that this law professor discovered and wrote about in 2018. First a little bit about the author: Mary S. Holland, ” Director of the Graduate Lawyering program. She joined the NYU Lawyering faculty in 2002 and has directed the Graduate Lawyering program since 2004. Before teaching, she clerked for a federal judge in the Southern District of New York, worked for an international human rights organization, and was an associate at two major US law firms in international transactional law. She worked for American law firms in Moscow, Russia for three years. She graduated from Columbia Law School, Columbia School of International and Public Affairs and Harvard College. Her research interest is in human rights and health law, with a particular focus on the law and policy of vaccination. ” https://www.law.nyu.edu/graduateaffairs/graduatelawyering/facultybios
In an article she published in the Emory Law Journal in 2018, she made the following discovery details regarding vaccines and their safety during and AFTER the 1986 U.S. NATIONAL CHILDHOOD VACCINE INJURY ACT. Here are some excerpts from that article, but I recommend you read the complete article on the Emory Law Journal website at the links below.
” An important empirical study recently published confirms that the inability to sue vaccine manufacturers in U.S. civil courts since 1986 is associated with a decrease in vaccine safety in FDA-approved vaccines after 1986. 235 In this peer-reviewed analysis, Professor DeLong looked at what happened to vaccine safety after “delitigation” or removal of litigation risk through the Vaccine Act. Using national and state-level data, she found that vaccines the FDA licensed after the Vaccine Act are associated with more adverse events than those it licensed earlier when consumers could sue. 236
DeLong observes that after the Vaccine Act passed in 1986, the amount of investment in biologic products, including vaccines, tripled from $85.6 million in 1986 to $273.7 million in 1989. 239 Also the number of investigational new drug applications more than doubled from the 1980s to the 1990s, suggesting that manufacturers had incentives to produce new and potentially riskier products. 240
DeLong found that vaccines licensed after 1986 are associated with approximately 5.2 more reported adverse events per 100,000 vaccine doses than the vaccines that were licensed before the passage of Vaccine Act. 247 The weighted averages suggest that pre-legislation vaccines are associated with 14.0 adverse events per 100,000 while post-legislation vaccines are associated with 19.2 adverse events per 100,000. 248 This difference is statistically significant at the 1% level. 249 (Emphasis added)
DeLong’s analysis suggests that the Vaccine Act “gave firms greater incentives to capture the regulator: If consumers cannot sue firms for product liability, the only barrier to sales is regulatory approval.” 252
She suggests that the Vaccine Act may be creating “moral hazard” because vaccine manufacturers do not have to answer to people damaged by their products. 253 The manufacturers do not even contribute to the compensation fund; excise taxes from consumers fund it. DeLong has shown empirically that “[d]elitigation appears to have removed an important safety monitor in the vaccine industry” and suggests the need for further study. 254 She suggests that Dr. Salk, who opposed the creation of the NVICP in congressional hearings before Congress passed the Vaccine Act, “appears to be prescient in his concerns that indemnification would reduce incentives to improve an existing vaccine and to change vaccine policy.” 255 “
Emory Law Journal, Volume 67, Issue 3 , 2018 (Holland) Accessed June 11, 2019
With all that being said, I feel that we are justified when we say that as long as the pharmaceutical giants don’t have to answer for their vaccines, which injure and kill people, they have no incentive to make sure that they are safe. Therefore, we must retain the right to choose for our families which vaccines, IF ANY, that we are willing to subject our families to. Remember, WHERE THERE IS A RISK, THERE MUST BE CHOICE!
What exactly is RNA and what does it have to do with vaccines? To understand this, we must first understand that vaccines are considered a biologic. What does that mean, it means that it is
“manufactured in a living system such as a microorganism, or plant or animal cells. Most biologics are very large, complex molecules or mixtures of molecules. Many biologics are produced using recombinant DNA technology. …it is difficult, and sometimes impossible, to characterize a complex biologic by testing methods available in the laboratory, and some of the components of a finished biologic may be unknown. Therefore, for biologics, “the product is the process.” Because the finished product cannot be fully characterized in the laboratory, manufacturers must ensure product consistency, quality, and purity by ensuring that the manufacturing process remains substantially the same over time. The living systems used to produce biologics can be sensitive to very minor changes in the manufacturing process. Small process differences can significantly affect the nature of the finished biologic and, most importantly, the way it functions in the body.”
Notice in the quote above I highlighted the words ” recombinant DNA technology. ” What exactly is recombinant DNA technology? This is where it gets real interesting and most people have no idea what RNA is and how it is made. According to Encyclopædia Britannica, RNA is:
“Recombinant DNA technology, joining together of DNAmolecules from two different species that are inserted into a host organism to produce new genetic combinations that are of value to science, medicine, agriculture, and industry. Since the focus of all genetics is the gene, the fundamental goal of laboratory geneticists is to isolate, characterize, and manipulate genes. Although it is relatively easy to isolate a sample of DNA from a collection of cells, finding a specific gene within this DNA sample can be compared to finding a needle in a haystack. Consider the fact that each human cell contains approximately 2 metres (6 feet) of DNA. Therefore, a small tissue sample will contain many kilometres of DNA. However, recombinant DNA technology has made it possible to isolate one gene or any other segment of DNA, enabling researchers to determine its nucleotide sequence, study its transcripts, mutate it in highly specific ways, and reinsert the modified sequence into a living organism. “
MRC-5 cells (a line of normal human diploid cells) also aborted fetus cells found in DTaP-IPV (Quadracel), DTaP-IPV/Hib (Pentacel), Hep A (Havrix), Hep A (Vaqta), Hep A/Hep B (Twinrix), MMRV (ProQuad)(Frozen), MMRV (ProQuad)(Refrigerator Stable), Rabies (Imovax), Varicella (Varivax)Frozen, Varicella (Varivax)Refrigerator Stable, Zoster (Shingles)(Zostavax) Frozen, Zoster (Shingles)(Zostavax) Refrigerator Stable,
fetal bovine serum (comes from the blood drawn from a bovine fetus ): Adenovirus, MMR (MMR-II), Rotavirus (RotaTeq), Varicella (Varivax)Frozen
human serum albumin ( protein in human blood plasma ): Adenovirus, Rabies (RabAvert), Smallpox (Vaccinia)(ACAM2000)
recombinant human albumin : MMR (MMR-II), MMRV (ProQuad)(Refrigerator Stable)
Latham medium derived from bovine casein : DTaP (Infanrix), DTaP (Infanrix), DTaP-HepB-IPV (Pediarix), Tdap (Boostrix)
VERO cells (kidney epithelial cells extracted from an African green monkey. ) : DTaP-IPV (Kinrix), DTaP-HepB-IPV (Pediarix), Polio (IPV – Ipol), Rotavirus (RotaTeq), Rotavirus (Rotarix)
normal human diploid cells, (human aborted fetuses): DTaP-IPV (Quadracel)
CMRL 1969 medium supplemented with calf serum: DTaP-IPV (Quadracel), DTaP-IPV/Hib (Pentacel)
bovine serum albumin, albumin protein from cows: DTaP-IPV/Hib (Pentacel), Japanese Encephalitis (Ixiaro)
modified Mueller and Miller medium ( the procedure involves the use of a variant and somewhat unstable strain of Clostridium Tetani and a culture medium containing a pancreatic digest of casein with additional cystine and tyrosine, beef heart infusion, glucose and inorganic salts. ): DTaP-IPV/Hib (Pentacel), Hib (ActHIB)
bovine albumin : Hep A (Vaqta)
yeast DNA : Hep B (Heplisav-B)
yeast protein : DTaP-HepB-IPV (Pediarix), Hep B (Engerix-B), Hep B (Recombivax), Hep B (Heplisav-B), Hep A/Hep B (Twinrix), Human Papillomavirus(HPV) (Gardasil 9)
vero cells [DNA from porcine circoviruses (PCV) 1 and 2: Rotavirus (RotaTeq), Rotavirus (Rotarix)
African Green Monkey kidney (Vero) cells : Smallpox (Vaccinia)(ACAM2000)
All of these ingredients and their respective vaccines can be found at the CDC website vaccine ingredient pages.
Now we learn that with RNA, as stated above, “DNA molecules from two different species that are inserted into a host organism to produce new genetic combinations”. So that means they are splitting human DNA with the DNA of animals and aborted fetuses and then injecting it back into our bodies with the hopes that it will cause us to create the antigen needed to immunize us against a virus. Did you notice that most of those with animal and human DNA are on the schedule for our children to be injected with before they start school and throughout our lives?
So what is the difference between a biologic, reference, or biosimilar product? According to the FDA it is:
“What is a biological product? used to diagnose, prevent, treat, and cure diseases and medical conditions. Biological products are a diverse category of products and are generally large, complex molecules. These products may be produced through biotechnology in a living system, such as a microorganism, plant cell, or animal cell, and are often more difficult to characterize than small molecule drugs. What is a reference product? A reference product is the single biological product, already approved by FDA, against which a proposed biosimilar product is compared. A reference product is approved based on, among other things, a full complement of safety and effectiveness data. A proposed biosimilar product is compared to and evaluated against a reference product to ensure that the product is highly similar and has no clinically meaningful differences. What is a biosimilar product? A biosimilar is a biological product that is highly similar to and has no clinically meaningful differences from an existing FDA-approved reference product.”
Do you know what CISA is? CISA stands for Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) Project. “CISA addresses vaccine safety issues, conducts high quality clinical research, and assesses complex clinical adverse events following vaccination. CISA facilitates CDC’s collaboration with vaccine safety experts at leading academic medical centers and strengthens national capacity for vaccine safety monitoring. The CISA Project provides consultation to US clinicians who have vaccine safety questions about a specific patient residing in the US. In addition, CISA provides consultation to US healthcare providers and public health partners on vaccine safety issues, and reviews clinical adverse events following immunization ( AEFI) involving the US-licensed vaccines.” What companies are in the list of CISA sites, well you might be surprised. That group of companies that are SUPPOSED to insure the safety of vaccines are the very ones (some at least) who are responsible for creating the vaccines.
Doesn’t that sound like the fox guarding the hen house? Why would they have any incentive to make sure the vaccines were safe when vaccine manufacturers aren’t even held liable for their product when it injures or kills someone. The only product that you can not sue for damages caused they their products.
I also found it very interesting when researching all this that the Gates Foundation has invested “$52 million (€46 million) in CureVac, a leading clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company specializing in mRNA-based vaccine technologies.” “
“As part of the agreement, the foundation will also provide separate funding for several projects to develop prophylactic vaccines based on CureVac’s proprietary messenger RNA (mRNA) platform. In addition, CureVac’s longstanding investor dievini Hopp BioTech announced a commitment of $24 million (€21 million) of additional equity.
CureVac is pioneering the use of natural and chemically unmodified mRNA as a data carrier to instruct the human body to produce its own proteins capable of fighting a wide range of diseases. CureVac’s novel technology is the broadest and most advanced mRNA therapeutic platform and allows for rapid, low-cost production of multiple drugs and vaccines. Additionally, CureVac’s mRNA vaccines are thermostable, which eliminates the demand for cold-chain storage and infrastructure, a major challenge in the vaccine supply of most developing countries.” (Press Release, March 5, 2015, Gates Foundation)
We all know that Gates has previously said during TED2010 talk in reference to climate change and emissions was to depopulate. Specifically he states, ” First, we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent. ”
A great number of people believe that he wants to depopulate the world and this is the video where that theory came from. Given the fact he is being sued by other countries for giving out the polio vaccine when then in turn gave thousands of children Polio, should we trust anything he is invested in? Note: He is also responsible for getting Common Core in your schools, but that is another venue and another story.
So, I learned a lot about RNA and how the DNA is being split to create a new DNA strand and then used in vaccines, what about you?
” A mass immunization campaign with a Urabe-containing measles-mumps-rubella vaccine was carried out in 1997 in the city of Salvador, northeastern Brazil, with a target population of children aged 1-11 years. There was an outbreak of aseptic meningitis following the mass campaign. Cases of aseptic meningitis were ascertained through data collected from the records of children admitted to the local referral hospital for infectious diseases between March and October of 1997, using previously defined eligibility criteria. Vaccination histories were obtained through home visits or telephone calls. Eighty-seven cases fulfilled the study criteria. Of those, 58 cases were diagnosed after the vaccination campaign. An elevated risk of aseptic meningitis was observed 3 weeks after Brazil’s national vaccination day compared with the risk in the prevaccination period (relative risk = 14.3; 95% confidence interval: 7.9, 25.7). This result was confirmed by a case series analysis (relative risk = 30.4; 95% confidence interval: 11.5, 80.8). The estimated risk of aseptic meningitis was 1 in 14,000 doses. This study confirms a link between measles-mumps-rubella vaccination and aseptic meningitis. The authors discuss the implications of this for the organization and planning of mass immunization campaigns. “
In December 2018, an Italian company, Corvelva, did a safety study on the Infanrix Hexa vaccine which is given to babies in the US at 2, 4, and 6 months according to the CDC recommended schedule, as TDaP.
This is the shocking results of that study:
In Infanrix Hexa we found chemical contamination from the manufacturing process or cross-contamination with other manufacturing lines; chemical toxins; bacterial peptide toxins; insoluble and indigestible macromolecule that reacts to the protein assay, but cannot be recognized by any protein databases. We have not found: Protein antigens of diphtheria toxoids, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, haemophylus influenzae B, Poliomyelitis 1-2-3; Formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde, phenoxyethanol, antibiotic residues indicated in the composition; “Not only vaccine antigens have been not detected, there were also 65 signs of chemical contaminants of which only 35% is known, there are among these various processing residues and cross-contaminations from other manufacturing lines, and their identification will be checked during the second level of the analytical study (i.e. with standard controls). 7 chemical toxins among these signals have also been identified, probably deriving from chemical contaminants of the manufacturing process or other manufacturing lines at the vaccine manufacturing site; these toxins have a structure that could probably be partially derived from the formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde and cyanogen bromide reaction with other chemical contaminants in the vaccine. We’d like to point out that the toxicity of many of these toxins have been confirmed and published in Pubchem or Toxnet and this poses important safety problems, issues and concerns. From the protein and peptide fraction study, various free peptides of bacterial origin have been obtained probably coming from the bacterial culture cells used for the antigen extraction. Literature reports bacterial peptides as potential allergens 5 and also as capable of inducing autoimmune reactions 6 and these too put a safety issue that needs to be further clarified with the regulatory bodies. Coming back to the two basic principles that have been our topic on this analysis path, we reaffirm what we have said in the recent interview on the scientific journal Nature: we are inquiring the vaccines efficacy and safety and we can’t quite understand how it is possible to claim that this vaccine is even able to generate the 6 protective antibodies – reason why it is designed for – and furthermore to understand how this cluster made of 6 neurotoxic antigens bound together can be claimed as not toxic for newborns. Infanrix Hexa hexavalent, as for the method we have commissioned, casts major doubts on both its effectiveness and on its safety
This poor family lost their precious baby within less than 24 hours after he got her 8 week vaccines of: -Hexa Infanrix (DTaP/IPV/Hib/HepB)- Pneumococcal vaccine (PVC)- Meningitis B (Bexsero)- Rota vaccine (Rotarix) via the mouth. Yet, there are those in science to try to tell you “IT was not caused by the vaccine”. Of course it was, nothing else could have done it. Those chemicals in that mixture of so called “immunizations” were a toxic mess to this poor babies body. Here is list of the chemicals in those vaccines: DTaP (Infanrix)Fentonmedium containing a bovine extract, modified Latham medium derived from bovine casein, formaldehyde, modified Stainer-Scholte liquid medium, glutaraldehyde, aluminum hydroxide,sodium chloride, polysorbate 80 (Tween 80
“The Government intends to solicit and negotiate directly with Advanced Bioscience Resources (ABR)Inc. and no solicitation will be issued. The objective is to acquire Tissue for Humanized Mice. ABR is the only company that can provide the human fetal tissue needed to continue the ongoing research being led by the FDA. Fresh human tissues are required for implantation into severely immune-compromised mice to create chimeric animals that have a human immune system. This human immune system allows us to test biological drug products for safety and efficacy. This is necessary because these drug products do not bind non-human species drug targets. (emphasis added)
In this article of statement from the Federal Government, it shows they are working with company to obtain FRESH fetal cells, meaning they are wanting to get new aborted baby cells.
Then in September of 2018, the HHS released this statement on their website:
“After a recent review of a contract between Advanced Bioscience Resources, Inc. and the Food and Drug Administration to provide human fetal tissue to develop testing protocols, HHS was not sufficiently assured that the contract included the appropriate protections applicable to fetal tissue research or met all other procurement requirements. As a result, that contract has been terminated, and HHS is now conducting an audit of all acquisitions involving human fetal tissue to ensure conformity with procurement and human fetal tissue research laws and regulations. In addition, HHS has initiated a comprehensive review of all research involving fetal tissue to ensure consistency with statutes and regulations governing such research, and to ensure the adequacy of procedures and oversight of this research in light of the serious regulatory, moral, and ethical considerations involved. Finally, HHS is continuing to review whether adequate alternatives exist to the use of human fetal tissue in HHS funded research and will ensure that efforts to develop such alternatives are funded and accelerated.”
In other words, they couldn’t guarantee that the company would be able to meet their requirements and since it was the only one they thought could do it, now what are they going to do?
Is this perhaps the reason that the left is pushing so hard to get partial birth abortions legalized? Is this why they want to take away the right of any baby that survives an abortion to live and be able to kill them, even though they were born alive? Just for their sick agenda?
So who is Stanley Plotkin and why does it matter? Well according to Wikipedia (see below) Stanley Plotkin is a much respected doctor whom others look to for information and he created the Rubella vaccine as well as the Rotavirus vaccine. So when he says in the following videos how they used monkeys, mice, cow, and human aborted fetus cells to create vaccines and the issues that vaccines can cause, you should listen. This is one of the inventors telling about the vaccines, and sure they will always spin it to their benefit. How much do they get off the vaccine creation, which will be a story for another time. Today, we will focus on the deposition that Stanley gave (UNDER OATH), those videos are listed below. Please take the time to watch them all.
I find it extremely interesting when he talks about using aborted fetus cells in the vaccines. A great many people use the argument that the aborted fetus cells came from a fetus in the 60s and no new fetuses are being used in the manufacture of vaccines. However, while watching the first video you will hear Stanley Plotkin say that aborted fetus cells for the vaccines are only good for 50 years…although it wasn’t said, that would mean that they have had to (in the last decade) obtain more fetus cells in order to REFRESH the supply. A lot of people give that as a reason they don’t agree with religious exemptions against the vaccine, but if they are still using fresh babies (I don’t think of them as fetuses, but as babies because they have a heartbeat already which can be heard at least by 6 weeks), then religious exemptions cannot be done away with.
In regards to personal of philosophical exemptions, those must remain for the mere fact that doctors are now being persecuted for giving medical exemptions. I found that my child having had seizures and being hospitalized for a weeks, and my grandchild having seizures and being hospitalized for a week, will not get them out of being “required” to get vaccines. It would only eliminate the MMR vaccine for them. Even though the other vaccines with toxic chemicals would be required for them to go to school or day care, and if some states pass the laws they want to, it would keep them locked up like prisoners even though they are not the ones who are sick and passing along the disease. The fact is that vaccines shed the viruses they are suppose to “immunize” you too. So in fact, those who are getting the MMRII and other vaccines are shedding that live virus for almost 30 days, which is why it is recommended not to go around anyone pregnant, immuno-compromised, or newborn babies for 28 days, because you will give them the vaccine strain of the disease. The only way to get immunity to any disease is to actually get the disease, which is why vaccines require boosters every few years.
Yes, they are 9 hours of testimony, but I think regardless of whether
you support vaccine choice and parental rights to choose, or you are
fighting to retain those rights, you really need to watch them all. You
can’t fight the fight without the education.
Dr. Paul Thomas who supports educating patients about vaccines and letting them choose which to get, not only said that the “Health Department” told him there has not been a single case of “community acquired” measles through this whole so called “outbreak”…this after a child presented in his clinic with the symptoms on measles and he wanted to send a sample to them for analysis. They also told him not to send the sample.
Which means the un-vacccinated or not completely vaccinated are not passing it around, it is coming from the vaccines themselves. This is a totally different strand of the measles and has to be treated differently than the wild measles. Not only that, but he did a study on his patients that he has been taking care of since they were born and found that those who were vaccinated had a higher rate of autism. People need to stop relying on so called news reports, the facts are not what the narrative is that is being pushed. It is all a part, I think, of the agenda of the AAP, the UN, and the Healthy people 2020 (see documents on my other blogs about this agenda) agenda in which they want 100% vaccination regardless of whether you are opting out because a family member had a near death experience.
The ultimate goal is for every person including adults who are not up to date on vaccines to be shot up with the chemicals that are causing brain damage, paralysis, cancers, and death. Why would anyone submit themselves and their children to this knowing that it causes those types of problems regardless of how much they try to dispute it? Why would you want to force someone to get a medical procedure and hope they don’t come after you to get a mandatory medical procedure later on?
Did you know that people had fewer outbreaks of measles BEFORE the vaccines were even administered? Most people are told that the vaccine eradicated the measles, but the numbers don’t support that…if you look at the graph put out by the CDC itself, you can see that they are not truthful about the vaccine being what lowered the rate of infections…
If they aren’t truthful about that, what else are they not truthful about? To be fully informed, you must look at where the money comes from, who benefits the most in the push for vaccines, the package inserts which no parent actually gets at the doctors offices, look up the chemicals in the vaccines and how dangerous they are, but most of all, look at the stories coming from parents who had their children disabled or worse die within hours or days of getting the vaccines…don’t believe us, just look at this payout..over $4 billion dollars for vaccine injuries and deaths…
You can’t even sue the vaccine manufacturers when your child is injured or killed by those same vaccines that are suppose to protect them. The reason is that they were getting sued so much that they told the US Government that if they didn’t get immunity from being sued they would stop making vaccines….so are vaccines really needed or is it just guaranteed money for them?
I hope and pray that no one ever tries to force you or yours to get a medical procedure like sterilization, circumcision, or any other procedure( has already happened in the US) that you would not want to have done when the science is still so sketchy on it and different ones are pulled all the time. Look at regular medicines like blood pressure meds, heart pills, anti-acids, hernia mesh, and so many others that have been used for years and are just now being pulled because they are killing people or injuring them and they were studied better than vaccines are. Would you want to be forced to continue to take them even knowing they could kill you? That is your right to refuse them, just as it IS a parents right to refuse vaccines they don’t feel safe with and it should remain their right.
Senator Robert Foley said that this first child died after the routine vaccines and he refuses to vaccinate his other children with that same vaccine because he doesn’t want them to die. video Senator Robert Foley on the Death of his Daughter Following the Pertussis vaccine
However, he can’t get a medical exemption for them as it is still recommended that they get the vaccine…does that make any sense to anyone…you already killed one of my children, but go ahead and poison the others too …hopefully they will live…NO… we would be doing everything in our power to keep our children safe.
My thought is that those who have gotten the vaccines should be the ones that are prohibited from going to school for 30 days as the vaccines shed (MMRII) and they will be shedding the virus to anyone they come in contact with, so that the vaccine strain measles is spread further.
“AAP leaders have called for elimination of non-medical* exemptions to vaccination to be the top priority for the year, ranking it first among the top 10 resolutions during the Annual Leadership Forum (ALF).
“Given the measles outbreaks, prioritizing the elimination of non-medical vaccine exemptions is a timely undertaking,” said AAP President Kyle E. Yasuda, M.D., FAAP.
The resolution asks the Academy’s Board of Directors to advocate for the “development of a toolkit that highlights successful chapter strategies for the purpose of helping chapters work with their state legislatures to eliminate/reduce non-medical* exemptions that have allowed immunization refusals.”
Top 10 resolutions:
Eliminating Non-medical* Exemptions to Vaccinating Children
Excerpt: “A mass immunization campaign with a Urabe-containing measles-mumps-rubella vaccine was carried out in 1997 in the city of Salvador, northeastern Brazil, with a target population of children aged 1-11 years. There was an outbreak of aseptic meningitis following the mass campaign. Cases of aseptic meningitis were ascertained through data collected from the records of children admitted to the local referral hospital for infectious diseases between March and October of 1997, using previously defined eligibility criteria. Vaccination histories were obtained through home visits or telephone calls. Eighty-seven cases fulfilled the study criteria. Of those, 58 cases were diagnosed after the vaccination campaign. An elevated risk of aseptic meningitis was observed 3 weeks after Brazil’s national vaccination day compared with the risk in the prevaccination period (relative risk = 14.3; 95% confidence interval: 7.9, 25.7). This result was confirmed by a case series analysis (relative risk = 30.4; 95% confidence interval: 11.5, 80.8). The estimated risk of aseptic meningitis was 1 in 14,000 doses. This study confirms a link between measles-mumps-rubella vaccination and aseptic meningitis. The authors discuss the implications of this for the organization and planning of mass immunization campaigns.”
Why would we need something called a Vaccine Injury Compensation Program if vaccines are “perfectly safe” as a lot of legislature, Senator, Governors, Congressman, and doctors are proclaiming? Fact is that even the supreme court opinion says that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe” yet there are those who would try to force mandated vaccines on us and our kids. It is been proven over and over again that people are injured and some die from vaccines. There are plenty of stories on the internet of parents who are trying to come to grips with losing their child either mentally or physically within hours or days of getting their vaccines.
Does this sound like they are perfectly safe to your? What will you do when they come for you too? That is the plan that all people, including adults either show titer proof that they have had the disease or they will force you to get the vaccines too and all the boosters you haven’t had since you were a child.
The actual vaccine wears off over time so they recommend boosters, which most adults don’t bother to get, yet we aren’t getting sick from those missed shots. However, if they take away parent right to choose, trust me they will then proceed to make all adults get caught up on their vaccines. That is part of the UN Agenda 21 and the “Healthy People 2030” program.
“The Community Preventive Services Task Force recommends standing orders for vaccinations to increase vaccination rates among adults and children; when used alone or with additional interventions; and across a range of settings and populations. Standing orders authorize nurses, pharmacists, and other healthcare personnel where allowed by state law, to assess a client’s immunization status and administer vaccinations according to a protocol approved by an institution, physician, or other authorized provider. The protocol enables assessment and vaccination without the need for examination or direct order from the attending provider at the time of the interaction.” https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/tools-resources/evidence-based-resource/vaccination-programs-standing-orders
The authors claim that their work, “strongly supports that MMR
vaccination does not increase the risk for autism, does not trigger
autism in susceptible children, and is not associated with clustering of
autism cases after vaccination.”
This is an extremely broad claim that unfortunately is not
supported by the evidence they present. There are eight fundamental
flaws in the research study that lead to questions about the accuracy of
During measles outbreaks, it is important to be able to rapidly distin-guish between measles cases and vaccine reactions to avoid unnecessary outbreak response measures such as case isolation and contact investigations.
…. Endemic transmission of measles virus (MeV) was interrupted in the Americas in 2002(1), but since then, importations of measles from areas of endemicity have caused frequent and sometimes large outbreaks (2–6) and a recent transitory suspension of the elimination status (7). …….. Genotyping is used to confirm the origin of an outbreak and to exclude endemic circulation, but it is also the only way to distinguish vaccine strains from wild-type viruses.
What is being said in the above article is that they can now use Genotyping to determine if a measles outbreak like the ones currently going on are measles as a result of the vaccine or if it is from the actual disease virus itself. What is not being said is that the MMR II vaccine sheds for a period weeks. That is why when you receive that vaccine it is recommended that you do not go around immune compromised, pregnant women, or babies for a period of 28 days so that they don’t get the measles from you shedding the virus. Look it up on the actual package insert file below and download it.
Neural Dynamics Research Group, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L8, Canada. email@example.com
” Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science’s understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences. In our opinion, the possibility that vaccine benefits may have been overrated and the risk of potential adverse effects underestimated, has not been rigorously evaluated in the medical and scientific community. We hope that the present paper will provide a framework for a much needed and long overdue assessment of this highly contentious medical issue. “
Vaccines do not require randomized control trials.
Data is critical for decision-making for pharmacists. Yet, we are
urged to turn a blind eye to the fact that vaccines are not required to
undergo randomized controlled trials as drugs are.
In fact, there has never been a study that demonstrates that
vaccinated children have significantly less disease burden than
I get it. Some drugs are old. Grandfather in the polio vaccine and
approve it through the FDA. But do not expect me, as a data driven
pharmacist, to inject an unverified vaccine – such as the flu vaccine –
into every woman, including pregnant women, every man, including
vulnerable populations, and every child, including infants, without
raising an eyebrow.
If you criticize essential oils for lacking RCT testing, should you
not also criticize vaccines for the same? For people in favor of
mandatory vaccines, who fear that an unvaccinated person may infect a
vaccinated person, doesn’t this conclude that vaccines do not work?
Adverse drug effects happen.
I accept that, and I am willing to accept that vaccines may cause
adverse effects. Butsome the fact that drug manufacturers can hide
behind the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act is criminal. The
regulating bodies are not holding the drug companies accountable for
harm caused by their products. Instead, tax payers fund a special
vaccine court that pays out compensation to people who have suffered
adverse effects. Have you known someone who has suffered an adverse drug
event from a vaccine?
Ingredient quality is questionable.
There are many questionable ingredients in vaccines, including:
aluminum salts, formaldehyde, formalin, monosodium glutamate (MSG),
phenol. Additionally, many contain animal products, such as fetal bovine
and horse serum, egg, mouse, dog, and monkey cells, and gelatin, and
are therefore unsuitable to vegans.
Even more concerning is the inclusion of human fetal cells.
Currently, there are multiple vaccines (Hep A, MMR, Varicella, Zoster,
Adenovirus, Rabies) that contain one of two human cell cultures dating
back to the 1960s that originated from two aborted fetuses. For many
people this poses a major ethical problem.