Support religious and personal exemptions from vaccines that harm and kill our families.

Since the National Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 has allowed more unsafe vaccine to be created, which gives vaccine manufacturers complete immunity from ever being sued by the families of those who were injured or died from the vaccine, as the manufacturer wanted relief from all their lawsuits over injuries and deaths. Since the National Vaccine Injury Compensation court has paid out over $4 BILLION dollars for injuries and deaths, since some vaccines are created using “harvested” fetuses cells from babies that were aborted the last one in 2015 who was delivered via “bag method” so they have viable specimens to work with, since people who don’t support abortions have a religious or ethical reason to not vaccinate, we demand exemptions to support our 1st and 4th amendment and moral rights. https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/support-religious-and-personal-exemptions-vaccines-harm-and-kill-our-families

Please sign and then comment here is you wish. Lets show the federal government that our rights whether it be for religious or personal, moral, or other beliefs shall not be ignored….get as many signatures as you can….thanks.


Vaccines and RNA, What Is It?

What exactly is RNA and what does it have to do with vaccines? To understand this, we must first understand that vaccines are considered a biologic. What does that mean, it means that it is

“manufactured in a living system such as a microorganism, or plant or animal cells. Most biologics are very large, complex molecules or mixtures of molecules. Many biologics are produced using recombinant DNA technology.
…it is difficult, and sometimes impossible, to characterize a complex biologic by testing methods available in the laboratory, and some of the components of a finished biologic may be unknown.
Therefore, for biologics, “the product is the process.” Because the finished product cannot be fully characterized in the laboratory, manufacturers must ensure product consistency, quality, and purity by ensuring that the manufacturing process remains substantially the same over time.
The living systems used to produce biologics can be sensitive to very minor changes in the manufacturing process. Small process differences can significantly affect the nature of the finished biologic and, most importantly, the way it functions in the body.”


Notice in the quote above I highlighted the words ” recombinant DNA technology. ” What exactly is recombinant DNA technology? This is where it gets real interesting and most people have no idea what RNA is and how it is made. According to Encyclopædia Britannica, RNA is:

Recombinant DNA technology, joining together of DNA molecules from two different species that are inserted into a host organism to produce new genetic combinations that are of value to science, medicine, agriculture, and industry. Since the focus of all genetics is the gene, the fundamental goal of laboratory geneticists is to isolate, characterize, and manipulate genes. Although it is relatively easy to isolate a sample of DNA from a collection of cells, finding a specific gene within this DNA sample can be compared to finding a needle in a haystack. Consider the fact that each human cell contains approximately 2 metres (6 feet) of DNA. Therefore, a small tissue sample will contain many kilometres of DNA. However, recombinant DNA technology has made it possible to isolate one gene or any other segment of DNA, enabling researchers to determine its nucleotide sequence, study its transcripts, mutate it in highly specific ways, and reinsert the modified sequence into a living organism. “

Contributor: Anthony J.F. Griffiths
Article Title: Recombinant DNA technology
Website Name: Encyclopædia Britannica
Publisher: Encyclopædia Britannica, inc.
Date Published: December 07, 2018
URL: https://www.britannica.com/science/recombinant-DNA-tech

To determine what that means for our use of vaccines, we must first look at the different DNA contained in the various vaccines.

  1. human-diploid fibroblast cell cultures (strain WI-38) aka human aborted fetus cells found in: Adenovirus, MMR (MMR-II , MMRV (ProQuad)(Frozen), MMRV (ProQuad)(Refrigerator Stable)
  2. MRC-5 cells (a line of normal human diploid cells) also aborted fetus cells found in DTaP-IPV (Quadracel), DTaP-IPV/Hib (Pentacel), Hep A (Havrix), Hep A (Vaqta), Hep A/Hep B (Twinrix), MMRV (ProQuad)(Frozen), MMRV (ProQuad)(Refrigerator Stable), Rabies (Imovax), Varicella (Varivax)Frozen, Varicella (Varivax)Refrigerator Stable, Zoster (Shingles)(Zostavax) Frozen, Zoster (Shingles)(Zostavax) Refrigerator Stable,
  3. fetal bovine serum (comes from the blood drawn from a bovine fetus ): Adenovirus, MMR (MMR-II), Rotavirus (RotaTeq), Varicella (Varivax)Frozen
  4. human serum albumin ( protein in human blood plasma ): Adenovirus, Rabies (RabAvert), Smallpox (Vaccinia)(ACAM2000)
  5. recombinant human albumin : MMR (MMR-II), MMRV (ProQuad)(Refrigerator Stable)
  6. bovine extract: DTaP (Infanrix), DTaP-IPV (Kinrix), DTaP-HepB-IPV (Pediarix), Td (Mass Biologics), Tdap (Boostrix)
  7. Latham medium derived from bovine casein : DTaP (Infanrix), DTaP (Infanrix), DTaP-HepB-IPV (Pediarix), Tdap (Boostrix)
  8. VERO cells (kidney epithelial cells extracted from an African green monkey. ) : DTaP-IPV (Kinrix), DTaP-HepB-IPV (Pediarix), Polio (IPV – Ipol), Rotavirus (RotaTeq), Rotavirus (Rotarix)
  9. normal human diploid cells, (human aborted fetuses): DTaP-IPV (Quadracel)
  10. CMRL 1969 medium supplemented with calf serum: DTaP-IPV (Quadracel), DTaP-IPV/Hib (Pentacel)
  11. bovine serum albumin, albumin protein from cows: DTaP-IPV/Hib (Pentacel), Japanese Encephalitis (Ixiaro)
  12. modified Mueller and Miller medium ( the procedure involves the use of a variant and somewhat unstable strain of Clostridium Tetani and a culture medium containing a pancreatic digest of casein with additional cystine and tyrosine, beef heart infusion, glucose and inorganic salts. ): DTaP-IPV/Hib (Pentacel), Hib (ActHIB)
  13. bovine albumin : Hep A (Vaqta)
  14. yeast DNA : Hep B (Heplisav-B)
  15. yeast protein : DTaP-HepB-IPV (Pediarix), Hep B (Engerix-B), Hep B (Recombivax), Hep B (Heplisav-B), Hep A/Hep B (Twinrix), Human Papillomavirus(HPV) (Gardasil 9)
  16. Madin Darby Canine Kidney : Influenza (Flucelvax)Quadrivalent
  17. chick embryo cell culture : MMR (MMR-II), MMRV (ProQuad)(Frozen), MMRV (ProQuad)(Refrigerator Stable)
  18. chicken fibroblasts: Rabies (RabAvert)
  19. vero cells [DNA from porcine circoviruses (PCV) 1 and 2: Rotavirus (RotaTeq), Rotavirus (Rotarix)
  20. African Green Monkey kidney (Vero) cells : Smallpox (Vaccinia)(ACAM2000)

All of these ingredients and their respective vaccines can be found at the CDC website vaccine ingredient pages.

Now we learn that with RNA, as stated above, “DNA molecules from two different species that are inserted into a host organism to produce new genetic combinations”. So that means they are splitting human DNA with the DNA of animals and aborted fetuses and then injecting it back into our bodies with the hopes that it will cause us to create the antigen needed to immunize us against a virus. Did you notice that most of those with animal and human DNA are on the schedule for our children to be injected with before they start school and throughout our lives?

So what is the difference between a biologic, reference, or biosimilar product? According to the FDA it is:

“What is a biological product?
used to diagnose, prevent, treat, and cure diseases and medical conditions. Biological products are a diverse category of products and are generally large, complex molecules. These products may be produced through biotechnology in a living system, such as a microorganism, plant cell, or animal cell, and are often more difficult to characterize than small molecule drugs.
What is a reference product?
A reference product is the single biological product, already approved by FDA, against which a proposed biosimilar product is compared. A reference product is approved based on, among other things, a full complement of safety and effectiveness data. A proposed biosimilar product is compared to and evaluated against a reference product to ensure that the product is highly similar and has no clinically meaningful differences.
What is a biosimilar product?
A biosimilar is a biological product that is highly similar to and has no clinically meaningful differences from an existing FDA-approved reference product.”

FDA, Biosimilar and Interchangeable Products, 10/23/2017

Do you know what CISA is? CISA stands for Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) Project. “CISA addresses vaccine safety issues, conducts high quality clinical research, and assesses complex clinical adverse events following vaccination. CISA facilitates CDC’s collaboration with vaccine safety experts at leading academic medical centers and strengthens national capacity for vaccine safety monitoring. The CISA Project provides consultation to US clinicians who have vaccine safety questions about a specific patient residing in the US. In addition, CISA provides consultation to US healthcare providers and public health partners on vaccine safety issues, and reviews clinical adverse events following immunization ( AEFI) involving the US-licensed vaccines.” What companies are in the list of CISA sites, well you might be surprised. That group of companies that are SUPPOSED to insure the safety of vaccines are the very ones (some at least) who are responsible for creating the vaccines.

Current CISA Project Sites

Doesn’t that sound like the fox guarding the hen house? Why would they have any incentive to make sure the vaccines were safe when vaccine manufacturers aren’t even held liable for their product when it injures or kills someone. The only product that you can not sue for damages caused they their products.

I also found it very interesting when researching all this that the Gates Foundation has invested “$52 million (€46 million) in CureVac, a leading clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company specializing in mRNA-based vaccine technologies.” “

“As part of the agreement, the foundation will also provide separate funding for several projects to develop prophylactic vaccines based on CureVac’s proprietary messenger RNA (mRNA) platform. In addition, CureVac’s longstanding investor dievini Hopp BioTech announced a commitment of $24 million (€21 million) of additional equity.

CureVac is pioneering the use of natural and chemically unmodified mRNA as a data carrier to instruct the human body to produce its own proteins capable of fighting a wide range of diseases. CureVac’s novel technology is the broadest and most advanced mRNA therapeutic platform and allows for rapid, low-cost production of multiple drugs and vaccines. Additionally, CureVac’s mRNA vaccines are thermostable, which eliminates the demand for cold-chain storage and infrastructure, a major challenge in the vaccine supply of most developing countries.” (Press Release, March 5, 2015, Gates Foundation)

We all know that Gates has previously said during TED2010 talk in reference to climate change and emissions was to depopulate. Specifically he states, ” First, we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.  ”

A great number of people believe that he wants to depopulate the world and this is the video where that theory came from. Given the fact he is being sued by other countries for giving out the polio vaccine when then in turn gave thousands of children Polio, should we trust anything he is invested in? Note: He is also responsible for getting Common Core in your schools, but that is another venue and another story.

So, I learned a lot about RNA and how the DNA is being split to create a new DNA strand and then used in vaccines, what about you?

Copyright©2019 Families4vaccinechoice
Disclaimer: Information provided on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical or legal advice.


Vaccinated in Montana having outbreaks this year…

In February of 2019, ABC affiliates in Montana actually reported a story in which vaccinated in Bozeman were having an “Mumps cases confirmed in Bozeman Public Schools children” They said specifically,

” Health officials say the best protection against mumps is to get vaccinated, although the vaccine does not provide 100 percent immunity.
In rare cases, the viral illness can result in serious complications, such as encephalitis, meningitis, deafness or pancreatitis. “

ABC FOX Montana News Staff , Feb 12, 2019,

Then on May 10, 2019 this article was reported from the same news outlet. “Whooping cough outbreak infecting vaccinated children, health dept. hiring additional nurses

” The Missoula City-County Health Department has confirmed 92 cases of pertussis, or whooping cough, as of 1 PM Friday.
Supervisor of the Infectious Disease Office Cindy Farr says of those 92 confirmed cases, the majority of the children infected had previously been vaccinated.
“We’re still trying to investigate some of those cases,” Farr said Friday. “I can tell you the majority of them have been vaccinated kids. We have at least some that have been unvaccinated, but the majority of them definitely have been vaccinated.”

According to the Centers for Disease Control there are six parts to the whooping cough vaccination series. Five shots are done before a child turns six. When a they turn 11, an additional booster vaccine is needed. 
Farr said the booster vaccine is only 70 percent effective the first year, and gets less effective as time goes on.  “

ABCFOX News Staff, May 10, 2019

Copyright©2019 Families4vaccinechoice
Disclaimer: Information provided on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical or legal advice.


Conditions on the Vaccine Injury Table … “injuries/conditions that are presumed to be caused by vaccines”

” The Vaccine Injury Table (Table) makes it easier for some people to get compensation. The Table lists and explains injuries/conditions that are presumed to be caused by vaccines. It also lists time periods in which the first symptom of these injuries/conditions must occur after receiving the vaccine. If the first symptom of these injuries/conditions occurs within the listed time periods, it is presumed that the vaccine was the cause of the injury or condition unless another cause is found. For example, if you received the tetanus vaccines and had a severe allergic reaction (anaphylaxis) within 4 hours after receiving the vaccine, then it is presumed that the tetanus vaccine caused the injury if no other cause is found.
If your injury/condition is not on the Table or if your injury/condition did not occur within the time period on the Table, you must prove that the vaccine caused the injury/condition. Such proof must be based on medical records or opinion, which may include expert witness testimony. “

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Health Resources and Services Administration

The above link no longer works as the page has been removed from their website at that link. However, you can find the page as it was saved in the wayback machine, https://web.archive.org/web/20120427151217/http://www.hrsa.gov:80/vaccinecompensation/vaccinetable.html

You can find the printable table here…https://web.archive.org/web/20120126014731/http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/vaccineinjurytable.pdf

Copyright©2019 Families4vaccinechoice
Disclaimer: Information provided on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical or legal advice.


Where are the the antigens in the Infanrix Hexa vaccine and why is it cross contaminated?

In December 2018, an Italian company, Corvelva, did a safety study on the Infanrix Hexa vaccine which is given to babies in the US at 2, 4, and 6 months according to the CDC recommended schedule, as TDaP. 

This is the shocking results of that study:

In Infanrix Hexa we found
chemical contamination from the manufacturing process or cross-contamination with other manufacturing lines;
chemical toxins;
bacterial peptide toxins;
insoluble and indigestible macromolecule that reacts to the protein assay, but cannot be recognized by any protein databases.
We have not found:
Protein antigens of diphtheria toxoids, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, haemophylus influenzae B, Poliomyelitis 1-2-3;
Formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde, phenoxyethanol, antibiotic residues indicated in the composition;
Not only vaccine antigens have been not detected, there were also 65 signs of chemical contaminants of which only 35% is known, there are among these various processing residues and cross-contaminations from other manufacturing  lines, and their identification will be checked during the second level of the analytical study (i.e. with standard controls).
7 chemical toxins among these signals have also been identified, probably deriving from chemical contaminants of the manufacturing process or other manufacturing lines at the vaccine manufacturing site; these toxins have a structure that could probably be partially derived from the formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde and cyanogen bromide reaction with other chemical contaminants in the vaccine. We’d like to point out that the toxicity of many of these toxins have been confirmed and published in Pubchem or Toxnet and this poses important safety problems, issues and concerns.
From the protein and peptide fraction study, various free peptides of bacterial origin have been obtained probably coming from the bacterial culture cells used for the antigen extraction. Literature reports bacterial peptides as potential allergens 5 and also as capable of inducing autoimmune reactions 6 and these too put a safety issue that needs to be further clarified with the regulatory bodies.
Coming back to the two basic principles that have been our topic on this analysis path, we reaffirm what we have said in the recent interview on the scientific journal Nature: we are inquiring the vaccines efficacy and safety and we can’t quite understand how it is possible to claim that this vaccine is even able to generate the 6 protective antibodies – reason why it is designed for – and furthermore to understand how this cluster made of 6 neurotoxic antigens bound together can be claimed as not toxic for newborns.
Infanrix Hexa hexavalent, as for the method we have commissioned, casts major doubts on both its effectiveness and on its safety

Corvelva, December 16, 2018

The study translated from Italian to English by Corvelva can be downloaded at this url: https://www.corvelva.it/it/speciali-corvelva/analisi/vaccingate-initial-results-on-infanrix-hexa-chemical-composition.html

If at any time in the future that link does not work for the download you can find it on the wayback machine at https://web.archive.org/web/20190527122451/https://drive.google.com/file/d/128CfYaaJdMwhx5yvCGDRggl5GIKyfWrC/view

Copyright©2019 Families4vaccinechoice
Disclaimer: Information provided on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical or legal advice.


How do those who want mandatory vaccines push their agenda?

I recently read this article and thought, that is exactly what the CDC, the Left sided politicians, the pharmaceutical companies and the scientist who are on the pro-mandatory vaccine side are pushing on those who want to retain the choice of vaccines.

In The Disinformation Playbook How Business Interests Deceive, Misinform, and Buy Influence at the Expense of Public Health and Safety, they explain the 5 (five) plays that these groups use in everyday business to get done what THEY want done. Funny how this article that comes from a scientific group who thinks vaccines are safe and should be done, without question probably, would put something like this out when the groups above are the very ones using it against us.

This is so eerie when you consider that play number 5 is exactly what the pharmaceutical companies did when they threatened the US government that if they didn’t protect them from all the lawsuits they were getting from vaccine injury or deaths, they would limit making vaccines.

The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is a no-fault alternative to the traditional legal system for resolving vaccine injury petitions.
It was created in the 1980s, after lawsuits against vaccine companies and health care providers threatened to cause vaccine shortages and reduce U.S. vaccination rates,


With compensation for injuries and deaths at over $4 Billion right now, how can they say that vaccines are safe. This is proof enough that they can never say they are 100% safe and therefore can not make them mandatory, that is unless they want to allow for people to once again sue the manufacturers, who right now have no liability for those deaths or injuries.

Copyright©2019 Families4vaccinechoice
Disclaimer: Information provided on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical or legal advice.



“April 8, 2019
My name is Dr. Theresa Deisher. I am Founder and Lead Scientist at Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, whose mission is to educate the public about vaccine safety, as well as to pressure manufacturers to provide better and safer vaccines for the public. I obtained my doctorate from Stanford University in Molecular and Cellular Physiology in 1990 and completed my post-doctoral work at the University of Washington. My career has been spent in the commercial biotechnology industry, and I have done work from basic biological and drug discovery through clinical development.
I am writing regarding unrefuted scientific facts about fetal DNA contaminants in the Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccine, which must be made known to lawmakers and the public.
Merck’s MMR II vaccine (as well as the chickenpox, Pentacel, and all Hep-A containing vaccines) is manufactured using human fetal cell lines and is heavily contaminated with human fetal DNA from the production process. Levels in our children can reach up to 5 ng/ml after vaccination, depending on the
age, weight and blood volume of the child. That level is known to activate Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9), which can cause autoimmune attacks.”

Dr. Theresa Deisher,
Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute,
1749 Dexter Ave. N. Seattle, WA 98109

To read the rest of the letter click here: https://www.informedchoicewa.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/web2.SCPI_.Deisher.OpenLetter.pdf

For list of those vaccines that contain fetal DNA also listed as Human Diploid Cells (aborted babies) you can click here: http://mv3462p2bnv2ptxqp33ikj2j-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/vaccineListOrigFormat-1.pdf
Copy Permissible with Credit Children of God for Life ©

Formatted by me for best page view….

Copyright©2019 Families4vaccinechoice
Disclaimer: Information provided on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical or legal advice


“It’s about the role of government in our lives”

” The anti-vaccine controversy isn’t really about disease, public health, science, autism, or chronic illness. It’s not even about vaccines.
It’s about the role of government in our lives
As parents face off and hurl epithets, colossal special interests are having a field day codifying a set of laws that are systematically and comprehensively taking away our fundamental rights. It’s a massive overreach.
Will you grant government bureaucrats carte blanche to define and ultimately direct the education and welfare of your children across a broad spectrum of issues, and to allow your children to be taken away if you do not comply?
Yes, that’s exactly what this is about. “

Louise Kuo Habakus, https://kellybroganmd.com/how-the-anti-vaccine-movement-threatens-us-all/?fbclid=IwAR0HtHpas-36JMQlZ8OvMACS3zBTNlzHobJN4dRQ-HP8hqo_HOp_ZMSaGHg

I came across this article today that put into simple terms the very reason there is even a debate about whether a person has the right to choose or not to choose to vaccinate their children with every single dose currently on the CDC’s recommendations list and the 200+ vaccines that are currently in the works to add to the vaccines, such as the AIDS vaccines, the Ebola vaccine, etc. Things that we may not feel our family needs, but if we don’t have the choice of whether to get them or not, we will be forced to have them by a tyrannical system where the only ones who benefit are the manufacturers, the CDC, and their “stakeholders”.

You see, right now they are trying to turn us all against each other, so that the (pro- vaccine for everyone) moms and dads are demanding that those who want to limit the vaccines and chemicals their children (pro-choice for everyone) and themselves are exposed to, be forced to vaccinate their children or face penalties, jail, or have their children taken away. What they don’t realize is that when they give up everyone’s rights to refuse for any reason, you are telling the government that they own us and that you are willing to do anything that the government demands even if you think it is morally, religiously, or ethically wrong. You can’t take away one persons rights and retain your rights, that is not how it works. Once they get those who don’t vaccinate, they will come after you and force you to get all those vaccines that you haven’t gotten since you were a child. No need for you to worry about the amount of chemicals in them that can potentially kill you or your children, cause they can’t be held liable if you die…no other drug or device on the market has such free reign. Vaccines (if mandated) are the only chemicals that you can’t control your exposure to and the only one that you can’t sue the manufacturer for if you die or your child dies.

Did you know that the majority of vaccines list SIDS as an adverse reaction? Ever wonder why there are so many babies dying from SIDS death compared to decades ago? There is your answer.

Copyright©2019 Families4vaccinechoice
Disclaimer: Information provided on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical or legal advice.


Who is Stanley Plotkin, why does it matter?

So who is Stanley Plotkin and why does it matter? Well according to Wikipedia (see below) Stanley Plotkin is a much respected doctor whom others look to for information and he created the Rubella vaccine as well as the Rotavirus vaccine. So when he says in the following videos how they used monkeys, mice, cow, and human aborted fetus cells to create vaccines and the issues that vaccines can cause, you should listen. This is one of the inventors telling about the vaccines, and sure they will always spin it to their benefit. How much do they get off the vaccine creation, which will be a story for another time. Today, we will focus on the deposition that Stanley gave (UNDER OATH), those videos are listed below. Please take the time to watch them all.

I find it extremely interesting when he talks about using aborted fetus cells in the vaccines. A great many people use the argument that the aborted fetus cells came from a fetus in the 60s and no new fetuses are being used in the manufacture of vaccines. However, while watching the first video you will hear Stanley Plotkin say that aborted fetus cells for the vaccines are only good for 50 years…although it wasn’t said, that would mean that they have had to (in the last decade) obtain more fetus cells in order to REFRESH the supply. A lot of people give that as a reason they don’t agree with religious exemptions against the vaccine, but if they are still using fresh babies (I don’t think of them as fetuses, but as babies because they have a heartbeat already which can be heard at least by 6 weeks), then religious exemptions cannot be done away with.

In regards to personal of philosophical exemptions, those must remain for the mere fact that doctors are now being persecuted for giving medical exemptions. I found that my child having had seizures and being hospitalized for a weeks, and my grandchild having seizures and being hospitalized for a week, will not get them out of being “required” to get vaccines. It would only eliminate the MMR vaccine for them. Even though the other vaccines with toxic chemicals would be required for them to go to school or day care, and if some states pass the laws they want to, it would keep them locked up like prisoners even though they are not the ones who are sick and passing along the disease. The fact is that vaccines shed the viruses they are suppose to “immunize” you too. So in fact, those who are getting the MMRII and other vaccines are shedding that live virus for almost 30 days, which is why it is recommended not to go around anyone pregnant, immuno-compromised, or newborn babies for 28 days, because you will give them the vaccine strain of the disease. The only way to get immunity to any disease is to actually get the disease, which is why vaccines require boosters every few years.

Yes, they are 9 hours of testimony, but I think regardless of whether you support vaccine choice and parental rights to choose, or you are fighting to retain those rights, you really need to watch them all. You can’t fight the fight without the education.

Stanley Alan Plotkin (born May 12, 1932[1]) is an American physician who works as a consultant to vaccine manufacturers, such as Sanofi Pasteur, as well as biotechnology firms, non-profits and governments. In the 1960s, he played a pivotal role in discovery of a vaccine against rubella virus while working at Wistar Institute in Philadelphia. Plotkin was a member of Wistar’s active research faculty from 1960 to 1991. Today, in addition to his emeritus appointment at Wistar, he is emeritus professor of Pediatrics at the University of Pennsylvania. His book, “Vaccines”,[2][3] is the standard reference on the subject.[4][5] He is an editor with Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, which is published by the American Society for Microbiology in Washington, D.C..

Wikipedia, accessed 04/05/2019

Stanley Plotkin, Godfather of vaccines, UNDER OATH! – Part 1/9 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGDNsqk0KR0

Stanley Plotkin, Godfather of vaccines, UNDER OATH Part 2

Stanley Plotkin, Godfather of vaccines, UNDER OATH Part 3

Stanley Plotkin, Godfather of vaccines, UNDER OATH Part 4

Stanley Plotkin, Godfather of vaccines, UNDER OATH Part 5

Stanley Plotkin, Godfather of vaccines, UNDER OATH Part 6

Stanley Plotkin, Godfather of vaccines, UNDER OATH Part 7

Stanley Plotkin, Godfather of vaccines, UNDER OATH Part 8

Stanley Plotkin, Godfather of vaccines, UNDER OATH Part 9

Copyright©2019 Families4vaccinechoice
Disclaimer: Information provided on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical or legal advice.


The laws that govern childhood compulsory vaccination deprive parents and children of three ordinary tort law protections….

The laws that govern childhood compulsory vaccination deprive parents and children of three ordinary tort law protections: free and informed consent to an invasive medical procedure; accurate and complete information about vaccine ingredients and possible side effects; and the right to sue manufacturers and medical practitioners directly in the event of injury. While these atypical tort law standards have been adopted and upheld for the public good, this article argues that they have caused unintended and undesirable consequences. These effects include unnecessary compulsory childhood vaccinations; conflicts of interest in national vaccine policy; inadequate vaccine safety; inadequate warnings about vaccine risks; insufficient compensation for vaccine-induced injury; and other undesirable outcomes. The article offers a new interpretation of the landmark Supreme Court case, Jacobson v. Massachusetts, that recognizes constitutional limitations on compulsory vaccination, and sheds light on the key federal statute, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Act.1″

Source of excerpt: https://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=217116104122091031070122120101075103121046070053091056099116029109091017113117020081057056103059050003021085127017001114088087000085032086058066009123115066006123052013082100114126119103087083096107005021026022076112118010089121007029067127079090069&EXT=pdf&fbclid=IwAR0KaY8-nO7vG1FoE2qHzWrzARAnimDLo4ue4TJcYmy6xGJ9ZozRP4TFBpk

Copyright©2019 Families4vaccinechoice
Disclaimer: Information provided on this website is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical or legal advice.